air combat maneuvering f14 vs russian fighters

Up front, the question: Is 'Topgun' one word or two? The Navy generally used it as a single word when referring to the squadron, officially called the Navy Fighter Weapons School. Some of these terms are slang or lingo, others are defined in doctrine. They may differ from how they are used by other services or other countries. If you know where the bad guys are and engage before they even know of your presence, you’ve already won.Terms used in Bio's books Note: These definitions refer to how the terms are used in a US Navy environment, in the 1980s and 1990s. One other aspect of that is effective radar surveillance support, both AWACS and ground-based. Much lower than other modern US aircraft but much higher than everything else except the Harrier and Su-27.Ģ) Good call. You could also interpret it as a 75% success rate. That sample is far too small for a meaningful conclusion. With respect to the F-15E and F/A-18, you’re drawing a conclusion based on a total of four shoot-down events. The US and Israel both use it more in the attack role than in air defense, particularly when F-15s are available for the latter role.

Strangest and Weirdest – Aircraft editionġ) The F-16 is a multi-role fighter.

The common canard is that training trumps technology, but an air force with great technology but beset by political purges and struggling with maintenance problems and embargoes can still have a turkey shoot against an air force with both poor training and poor technology.Ħ) Su-27 is the only Russian fighter to have a positive kill ratio in combat, but as we all know this is likely due to “monkey model” export fighters, as well as the poor training standards of Arab air forces.ħ) The unbeaten (aircraft that have engaged in significant air combat but never been shot down in air-to-air combat): F-15 Eagle, Sea Harrier, Su-27. Compare this to more modern fighters and one can see how aircraft design has outpaced SAM systems.Ĥ) The poor performance of the Mirage F.1 is somewhat surprising.ĥ) The ridiculously high kill ratio of the F-14 in Iranian service is also surprising. They barely break even between kills and losses on the air-combat scorecard.Ģ) The F-15 Eagle is completely dominant as a fighter, 1) because it’s a really good aircraft, and 2) because it’s so expensive it can only be used by nations with enough money to invest in the training and maintenance it takes to make really good air forces.ģ) Looking at the losses of the F-4 to ground fire, one can see how big of a threat SAMs were in the 1960s and 1970s. Georgian border violation 2008 (Russia) 1-0-0įighters that have yet to see combat: F-22 Raptor, Saab Gripen, Eurofighter Typhoon, Ching-Kuo, J-10, Saeqeh, Azarakhsh, MiG-31, Su-30, Su-33, Su-35.ġ) US multi-role fighters seem to be primarily used in the strike role. Soviet-Iranian border violations (1986-87) (USSR) 0-2-0ĭid you know that MiGFlug once offered Edge of Space flights in the MiG-25 Foxbat? Syrian-Iraqi border violation (1986) (Iraq) 1-0-0 Iran-Afghan border violations (USSR) 4-0-0 Turkish border violation 1986 (Syria) 1-0-0Īfghan Civil War 1992-1996 (United Front) 4-0-Īfghan Civil War 1992-1996 (Dostum-Gulbuddin Militia) 0-2. Soviet-Iranian border clashes (USSR) 1-0-0 Waziristan War/NW Pakistan campaigns (Pakistan) 0-0-0 Yemen Border Clashes (Saudi Arabia) 0-0-0

Northern Watch, Southern Watch, Desert Fox (USA) 0-0-0

Iran Gulf Clash 1984 (Saudi Arabia) 1-0-0Īn interesting fact here – the F-15 once shot down a satellite! Northern Watch, Southern Watch, Desert Fox (USA) 2-0-0 Kosovo (Portugal, Belgium, Denmark, Turkey) 0-0-0Īfghanistan (USA, Netherlands, Denmark, Norway) 0-0-0 Air-to-air kills – Air-to-air losses – Losses to ground fireĪir-to-air kills – Air-to-air losses – Losses to ground fireĪircraft which were destroyed on the ground are not included in this analysis, because any plane can get destroyed on the ground no matter how good it or its pilot is. If it is still to small: Press and hold Ctrl and scroll up with your mouse.Ĭombat statistics for all fighter aircraft in use Below you can find the details – but first of all we would like to show you an overview, created by Wojtek Korsak, based on this article. Now we’ve been thinking of some statistics of various fighter aircraft in use. We’ve lately been talking about aircraft which have gone for combat several times.

Air combat maneuvering f14 vs russian fighters